🏛️ Gorgocutie explains
Okay history-lovers, this is a gem from the Daily Times, New Philadelphia, Ohio, July 9, 1924 — and it’s proof that newspapers used to be way more fun.
“People liking turtles better than cops will be pleased to learn a turtle bit off a cop’s toe in the Hudson River.” That’s the whole story. No paywall, no slideshow, no “you won’t believe what happened next.” Just a turtle committing a hate crime against law enforcement in the Hudson and the paper reporting it with zero editorial fluff.
As the commenter notes, this is the opposite of clickbait. The headline IS the story. It’s a complete narrative in one sentence: location (Hudson River), perpetrator (turtle), victim (cop’s toe), outcome (toe bitten off), and even the audience reaction.
1920s journalism was a different beast. Small-town papers ran stories like this alongside ads for horse liniment and reports on Mrs. Henderson’s church picnic. There was no 24-hour news cycle to fill — you just ran whatever weird thing happened that week.
The moral? Turtles: 1, Police: 0. And it’s been 102 years and I’m still not sure which side I’m on.
0 Comments